Re: is JIT available
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: is JIT available |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1153093.1595907224@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: is JIT available (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: is JIT available
Re: is JIT available |
| Список | pgsql-general |
David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes:
> Maybe this would be better?
> "returns true if jit is enabled and JIT compilation is available in
> this session (see Chapter 31)."
The general, non-hacker meaning of "jit is enabled" would seem to
be pretty much what this function is already doing; and for that
matter, the same can be said for "JIT compilation is available".
We need something that's less tautological-looking. Maybe along
the lines of
"returns true if a JIT compiler extension is available and the
<varname>jit</varname> parameter is set to <literal>on</literal>;
when this is true, JIT compilation will be performed."
?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: