Re: Introduce wait_for_subscription_sync for TAP tests
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Introduce wait_for_subscription_sync for TAP tests |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 115136.1662733870@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Introduce wait_for_subscription_sync for TAP tests (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Introduce wait_for_subscription_sync for TAP tests
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes: > Pushed. Recently a number of buildfarm animals have failed at the same place in src/test/subscription/t/100_bugs.pl [1][2][3][4]: # Failed test '2x3000 rows in t' # at t/100_bugs.pl line 149. # got: '9000' # expected: '6000' # Looks like you failed 1 test of 7. [09:30:56] t/100_bugs.pl ...................... This was the last commit to touch that test script. I'm thinking maybe it wasn't adjusted quite correctly? On the other hand, since I can't find any similar failures before the last 48 hours, maybe there is some other more-recent commit to blame. Anyway, something is wrong there. regards, tom lane [1] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=jacana&dt=2022-09-09%2012%3A03%3A46 [2] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=drongo&dt=2022-09-09%2011%3A16%3A36 [3] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=crake&dt=2022-09-09%2010%3A33%3A19 [4] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=peripatus&dt=2022-09-08%2010%3A56%3A59
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: