Re: Remove the limit on the number of entries allowed in

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: Remove the limit on the number of entries allowed in
Дата
Msg-id 1150392031.2587.10.camel@localhost.localdomain
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Remove the limit on the number of entries allowed in catcaches,  ("Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu>)
Ответы Re: Remove the limit on the number of entries allowed in catcaches,  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 17:50 +0800, Qingqing Zhou wrote:
> "Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote
> >
> > Can we do the same for the file descriptors in fd.c?
> >
> > Very often the total number of file descriptors is much less than the
> > maximum, so it would make sense to only maintain the LRU when we are
> > using more than 50%-75% of the maximum.
> >
> 
> I am not against doing it but AFAIR the LRU file operations is 

> (1) not frequent; 

The LRU moves each time we do FileRead or FileWrite, not just on
open/close operations.

> (2) the cost is only several CPU circles if we do not run out of
> fds; 

So its not really likely ever to show high on oprofile, but if its an
avoidable operation that isn't always needed, why do it?

> (3) the LRU lseek/close/open big cost is still not avoidable when we
> really run out of fds.

Agreed, but the limit is reasonably high, so this isn't anywhere near
being something we always hit otherwise we would be more worried.

--  Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re-thing PG_MODULE_MAGIC
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re-thing PG_MODULE_MAGIC