Re: Moving test_fsync to /contrib?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Moving test_fsync to /contrib? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 11503.1295283954@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Moving test_fsync to /contrib? (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Moving test_fsync to /contrib?
Re: Moving test_fsync to /contrib? Re: Moving test_fsync to /contrib? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: >> It seems like /contrib would be more natural, no? �/bin seems like >> overkill because most people will not want to run it. �Most of /contrib >> is installed already by installers, I think. > At least on Red Hat, it is packaged separately. On Red Hat, it is not packaged at all (at least not by me), and won't be unless it goes into contrib. I don't believe it belongs in the base package. Also, it's not going to get packaged at all unless it gets renamed to something less generic, maybe pg_test_fsync; I'm not going to risk the oppobrium of sticking something named "test_fsync" into /usr/bin. Moving to contrib would be a good opportunity to fix the name. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: