Re: in memory views
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: in memory views |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1147294882.9755.55.camel@state.g2switchworks.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: in memory views (Thomas Vatter <thomas.vatter@network-inventory.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: in memory views
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 15:54, Thomas Vatter wrote: > > > Yes, the difference between psql command line and application is 6 > seconds to 40 seconds. It is > exactly the step resultSet = excecuteQuery() that needs 40 seconds. I > use next() as a cursor > through the resultSet, but I fear this is not enough, do I have to use > createStatement(resultSetType, > resultSetConcurrency) respectively prepareStatement (resultSetType, > resultSetConcurrency) to > achieve the cursor behaviour? Not sure. I don't use a lot of prepared statements. I tend to build queries and throw the at the database. In that instance, it's done like: create cursor cursorname as select (rest of query here); fetch from cursorname; You can find more on cursors here: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/sql-declare.html Not sure if you can use them with prepared statements, or if prepared statements have their own kind of implementation.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: