Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1146501750.22037.14.camel@state.g2switchworks.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS? ("Tony Lausin" <tonylausin@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Sun, 2006-04-30 at 14:32, Tony Lausin wrote: > > [ rotfl... ] MySQL will fall over under any heavy concurrent-write > > scenario. It's conceivable that PG won't do what you need either, > > but if not I'm afraid you're going to be forced into Oracle or one > > of the other serious-money DBs. > > > > regards, tom lane > > Hi Tom, > > That's a scary idea - being forced into Oracle or Sybase. Isn't > Slashdot.org still running strongly off of MySQL? Depends on how you define strongly. Slashdot has a LOT of code in place to cache the content so it never has to hit the database directly. Basically, every X seconds, the data creating the site is ripped outta the database and produced as static content so that the writes and reads don't clobber each other. And it still takes a pretty big and fast machine to handle the load.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: