Re: pgwin32_open returning EINVAL
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgwin32_open returning EINVAL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 11461.1198164406@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgwin32_open returning EINVAL (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgwin32_open returning EINVAL
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 07:50:29PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> 2. Do we really want this to be WARNING? LOG seems a better idea, >> since it's not warning about anything the client app did wrong. > I put it as warning because I wanted to be sure the admin notices. If your > database is hanging 5+ seconds to open a file, you have a *big* problem, > and you need to fix it. Just putting it as LOG will probably make it much > more likely it's missed. This reasoning is faulty. For logging purposes, LOG is *more* severe (higher priority) than WARNING. I think it's fairly common to set log_min_messages = ERROR, which would mean that warnings disappear. On the client side, unless you're issuing queries by hand with psql, it's entirely likely that all non-error messages go into the bit bucket. You can't count on anyone ever noticing them in a production app. Use LOG. That's what it's there for. (If you want a more formal definition, I'd say it's for messages that a DBA would be interested in but are not directly relevant to a client app.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: