Re: [PATCH] "\ef " in psql
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] "\ef |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 11443.1220678918@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на |
Re: [PATCH] "\ef |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] "\ef |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote: > * the psql command seemed to have some ideas about supplying a blank > CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION command for a nonexistent function, but this > didn't actually work. In any case it seemed poorly thought out, because > you'd really need to pay some attention to *why* the regproc/regprocedure > lookup failed. I just ripped it out for the moment. I'm not averse to > the concept, if you can get it implemented properly. While I was out at dinner, the obvious solution presented itself: define \ef with no argument as being the command that presents an empty CREATE FUNCTION command template to fill in. This isn't any more or less typing than where I think you were going, and it eliminates all the ambiguity about whether you meant to type a nonexistent function name or just mistyped. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: