Re: Compile on x86_64
От | Raymond Auge |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Compile on x86_64 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1144080756.5881.21.camel@E-Learning-Eng.laurentian.ca обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Compile on x86_64 (Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Compile on x86_64
|
Список | pgadmin-support |
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 18:20 +0300, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 10:39 -0400, Raymond Auge wrote: > > I was under the assumption that an FC4 rpm should build using the > > standard FC4 wx packages. Is this wrong? I have every wx package > > installed. > > That is wrong. We use Wx from source installation. Hmm, then there is really no point in building an FC4 rpm at all... One should just build from source. This really goes against the theory of rpm packaging... Not a problem. I'll do that. Pity! As for whether I WANT an x86_64 build or not is irrelevant. If all the distribution's libraries are compiled x86_64 then that is the arch I must target, otherwise why use it at all... I know the pain I must go through to run ix86 applications concurrently with x86_64, and I don't much enjoy it. I'd rather stick with either one or the other. It's simply a matter of principle, and would be no different if I were using ppc instead (which I do and must compile pgAdminIII there as well). If there is a src rpm to simplify the move from one platform to another, then hooray. Otherwise there is always source. I'm not complaining, I'm just clarifying my situation and my natural assumptions. Ray > > Regards, -- Raymond Augé Senior System Analyst/Data Architect
В списке pgadmin-support по дате отправления: