Re: 2 forks for md5?
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 2 forks for md5? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1141.24.211.165.134.1127427208.squirrel@www.dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 2 forks for md5? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: 2 forks for md5?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane said: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: >> I turned on passwords and did see duplicate connections: > >> LOG: connection received: host=[local] >> LOG: connection received: host=[local] >> LOG: connection authorized: user=postgres database=test >> LOG: disconnection: session time: 0:00:00.61 user=postgres >> database=test host=[local] > > > One answer is to downgrade the "connection received" to a DEBUGn > message, so that it's only seen by those who presumably have something > of a clue. I don't really care for this, but you could certainly argue > that the other messages are sufficient for normal purposes. Why not INFO? cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: