Re: [v9.3] Row-Level Security
От | Florian Pflug |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [v9.3] Row-Level Security |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 113BF38F-43EC-46D7-93AF-423BEC77B025@phlo.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [v9.3] Row-Level Security (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [v9.3] Row-Level Security
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Jun28, 2012, at 17:29 , Tom Lane wrote: > Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> writes: >> 2012/6/27 Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>: >>> Hm, what happens if a SECURITY DEFINER functions returns a refcursor? > >> My impression is, here is no matter even if SECURITY DEFINER function >> returns refcursor. > > I think Florian has a point: it *should* work, but *will* it? > > I believe it works today, because the executor only applies permissions > checks during query startup. So those checks are executed while still > within the SECURITY DEFINER context, and should behave as expected. > Subsequently, the cursor portal is returned to caller and caller can > execute it to completion, no problem. Don't we (sometimes?) defer query startup to the first time FETCH is called? best regards, Florian Pflug
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: