Re: reassign owned to change the ownership for op class and family
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: reassign owned to change the ownership for op class and family |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 11348.1278172073@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: reassign owned to change the ownership for op class and family (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: reassign owned to change the ownership for op class and
family
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2010-02/msg00174.php > I wonder if we should think about back-patching just the syscache.h > portion of that patch. It would simplify back-patching, and might > make life easier for people trying to write extensions that are > compatible with multiple PG versions, too. Not sure. Maybe it will make back-patching a bit easier, but we don't normally consider back-patching cosmetic changes, which is what this really is. I don't buy the suggestion that third-party extensions would be able to rely on it across versions. They can't know if they're going to be compiled against the latest minor release or not. So it's just a question of whether it'll improve matters enough for our own back-patches. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: