Re: Supporting NULL elements in arrays
От | Marc Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Supporting NULL elements in arrays |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1131552939.12281.3.camel@bloodnok.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Supporting NULL elements in arrays (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Supporting NULL elements in arrays
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
How about representing null array elements with a special-case cast-like null? Something like {::null} __ Marc On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 23:30 -0400, pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org wrote: > Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 19:21:34 -0500 > From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> > To: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org > Subject: Re: Supporting NULL elements in arrays > Message-ID: <10097.1131495694@sss.pgh.pa.us> > > I wrote: > > ... the most straightforward thing to do is define an empty element > > as meaning a NULL. But this might be objected to on a couple of > grounds: > > I just thought of another, potentially fatal objection: it's ambiguous > whether '{}'::text[] should be taken to mean an empty (zero-length) > array or an array containing a single NULL element. > > For backwards compatibility it should mean an empty array, but then > there's no way to represent ARRAY(NULL) in data dumps, which won't > do either. > > The only workaround that comes to mind is to allow explicit > specification of what's meant: '[1:1]{}' would be needed to represent > the one-null case. Ugly. > > Ideas anyone? > > regards, tom lane >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: