Re: PostgreSQL vs mySQL, any performance difference for
| От | Scott Marlowe |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PostgreSQL vs mySQL, any performance difference for |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1130268250.15546.173.camel@state.g2switchworks.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL vs mySQL, any performance difference for ("Wes Williams" <wes_williams@fcbonline.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL vs mySQL, any performance difference for
Re: PostgreSQL vs mySQL, any performance difference for |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Cool. Does it still error out after issueing: set sql_mode='MYSQL323'; ??? Just wondering if bounds checking is still optional but is now op-out instead of opt-in, or if it's something that you can no longer turn off. The whole idea of correct behaviour being an option is pretty bad, but hopefully at least the defaults are for proper behaviour, or are heading that way. On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 13:52, Wes Williams wrote: > For what it may be worth, executing the same commands into MySQL > 5.0.15-nt-max (Win XP Pro) the following it received: > > mysql> create table test (i1 int); > Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.41 sec) > > mysql> insert into test values (123913284723498723423); > ERROR 1264 (22003): Out of range value adjusted for column (i1) at row 1 > > mysql> select * from test; > Empty set (0.03 sec) > > > Finally an improvement! > > ============================================================ > -----Original Message----- > mysql> create table test (i1 int); > Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.07 sec) > > mysql> insert into test values (123913284723498723423); > Query OK, 1 row affected, 2 warnings (0.07 sec) > > mysql> select * from test; > +------------+ > | i1 | > +------------+ > | 2147483647 | > +------------+ > 1 row in set (0.00 sec) > > And other fun things. >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: