Re: SegFault on 9.6.14
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SegFault on 9.6.14 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 11301.1565758338@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SegFault on 9.6.14 (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes: > Another point which I am wondering is why can't we use the existing > REWIND flag to solve the current issue, basically if we have access to > that information in nodeLimit.c (ExecLimit), then can't we just pass > down that to ExecShutdownNode? The existing REWIND flag tells subnodes whether they should *optimize* for getting rewound or not. I don't recall right now (well past midnight) why that seemed like a useful definition, but if you grep for places that are paying attention to that flag, I'm sure you'll find out. We probably don't want to give up that distinction --- if it had been equally good to define the flag as a hard yes-or-no, I'm sure we would have taken that definition, because it's simpler. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: