Re: wal_buffers
От | Ian Westmacott |
---|---|
Тема | Re: wal_buffers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1128603390.18319.16.camel@spectre.intellivid.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: wal_buffers ("Thomas F. O'Connell" <tfo@sitening.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: wal_buffers
Re: wal_buffers |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 02:39, Thomas F. O'Connell wrote: > The WAL Configuration chapter (25.2) has a pretty good discussion of > how wal_buffers is used: > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/wal-configuration.html > > You might also take a look at Josh Berkus' recent testing on this > setting: > > http://www.powerpostgresql.com/ Thanks; I'd seen the documentation, but not Josh Berkus' testing. For my part, I don't have a large number of concurrent connections, only one. But it is doing large writes, and XLogInsert is number 2 on the profile (with LWLockAcquire and LWLockRelease close behind). I suppose that is expected, but lead by the documentation I wanted to make sure XLogInsert always had some buffer space to play with. --Ian
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: