Re: Ready for beta yet?
От | Tomasz Rybak |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Ready for beta yet? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1128453873.4642.21.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Ready for beta yet? (blacknoz@club-internet.fr) |
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
Dnia 03-10-2005, pon o godzinie 18:50 +0200, blacknoz@club-internet.fr napisał(a): > Hi Tomasz, Dave and friends, > > first day to my new job and first day with an access to > the net since a long time. Good luck with new job. > Tomasz, if you have some time to produce a merge between > what you provided and what I've fixed in official debian I'd > appreciate your help now I particularly think to the pgagent part > of the package which was not taken in consideration in 1.2.2 and > also the i18n relocation. > OK. Here are changes I made, applied to revision 4490. They are mostly changes made by you in official Debian package, but I made few additional. For changelog, I put 1.4.0, because as I understand, we're trying to be ready for 1.4 release; I also put you name, as author of these changes. Feel free to put mine, if it's more appropriate. In rules, line 16, instead of _pgsql_inc:="/usr/include/postgresql -I./include" I put calling of pg_config; such behaviour was mentioned in changelog for libpq-dev 8.0.3-13 as more proper now. I also created new variable CPPFLAGS, where I put -I./include taken from _pgsql_inc. Previous situation resulted in warnings from configure script, because instead of putting -I into _pgsql_inc, it was passed to script as parameter, which wasn't sure what to do with that. pgAdmin was being built successfully, but I decided to get rid of this warning. I also had to change a bit calling configure script in line 50, and add CPPFLAGS to it. I also changed directory from ui to i18n line 106 of file rules. Last change I made is adding pgagent and i18n files in pgadmin3.install. Changelog in attachment. One remark. Why there are slony3 and slony3-data package? Both depend on each other, and from my point of view there is no need for them both; maybe it's good idea to merge them. However, I'm not experienced in Debian packages creating, and I don't know why split occurred, so I'll leave these two as they are, without changes. So it's up to you to decide what to do. -- Tomasz Rybak <bogomips@post.pl>
Вложения
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: