Re: License blurb (was: Release, 3rd draft)
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: License blurb (was: Release, 3rd draft) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1128376736.1584.6.camel@jd.commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: License blurb (was: Release, 3rd draft) ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: License blurb (was: Release, 3rd draft)
Re: License blurb (was: Release, 3rd draft) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
> > > > Too negative. We want to emphasize the positives of *our* license while not > > criticizing other people's. > > One issue is that many people seem to equate the two, so I think it's > going to be difficult/impossible to not have some negative verbage about > other licenses. But, I'll give it a shot... See my last post. It isn't that hard. You just completely ignore the fact that the GPL even exists or any other license for that matter. There is only one open source license for this PR and that is the BSD license. We don't even have to mention the others. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > - > Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240 > PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support > Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting > Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/ >
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: