Re: Performance for relative large DB
От | tobbe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Performance for relative large DB |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1124864702.822522.64410@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Performance for relative large DB (Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Performance for relative large DB
Re: Performance for relative large DB |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Hi Chris. Thanks for the answer. Sorry that i was a bit unclear. 1) We update around 20.000 posts per night. 2) What i meant was that we suspect that the DBMS called PervasiveSQL that we are using today is much to small. That's why we're looking for alternatives. Today we base our solution much on using querry-specific tables created at night, so instead of doing querrys direct on the "post" table (with 4-6M rows) at daytime, we have the data pre-aligned in several much smaller tables. This is just to make the current DBMS coop with our amount of data. What I am particulary interested in is if we can expect to run all our select querrys directly from the "post" table with PostgreSQL. 3) How well does postgres work with load balancing environments. Is it built-in? Best Regards Robert Bengtsson Project Manager
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: