Re: "Garbled" postgres logs
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: "Garbled" postgres logs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 11226.1175626976@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | "Garbled" postgres logs (Tim Goodaire <tgoodair@ca.afilias.info>) |
Ответы |
Re: "Garbled" postgres logs
Re: "Garbled" postgres logs |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tim Goodaire <tgoodair@ca.afilias.info> writes: > While going through some log files, we noticed that some of the log entries > are "garbled". For example: > 2007-03-27 01:19:44.139 UTC [1761474] oxrsa aepp xx.xx.xx.xx LOG: > duratio2007-03-n: 3751.27 01:19801 ms :44.139 statemenUTC [421940] > oxrt: EXECUsor > g aTE <unnaepp 10.4med> [P0.136.10REPARE: 8 LOG: select > durationname fro: 3866.1m epp_do88 ms smain_dz_tatementnames wh: > EXECUTere nameE <unnam = $1] > 2007-03-27 01:19:49.213 UTC [528480] oxrsa aepp xx.xx.xx.xx LOG: > duration: 4510.129 ms statement: EXECUTE <unnam2007-03-ed> [PR27 > 01:19EPARE: :49 > .213 select nUTC [294ame from930] oxr b_domsa aain_dz_nb > 10.4ames whe0.136.10re name 7 LOG: = $1] > We're seeing this in postgresql 8.1.8 on AIX 5.3. Also, even though we're > using the same binaries for a bunch of clusters, we've only seen this issue > on one of them. It looks like you've got messages from different backends being interleaved, which is surely not impossible but normally it only happens line-by-line at worst. This must have something to do with the buffering behavior on stderr. Perhaps the difference is caused by a difference in where the postmaster's stderr originally pointed --- was this postmaster started in a different fashion than the others? Note to hackers: would it make sense to use write() instead of fprintf() in send_message_to_server_log to avoid any possibility of stdio deciding to fragment the message? Possibly there'd be some marginal efficiency gain too. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: