Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux
От | Csaba Nagy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1121784727.3085.294.camel@coppola.muc.ecircle.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux
Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
[snip] > wasn't the whole thread. I agree with you that if we make setString > default to UNKNOWN, there had better be a way to say "by golly this > really is TEXT" for the corner cases. It'd be a good idea if it wasn't > limited to TEXT, either, but could allow specification of any random > datatype. This makes me think, isn't it possible to introduce a special type to say something like: setObject(..., Types.UNKNOWN), and map that to setting a string with type unknown ? In that case people could still use prepared statements with parameters of unknown type, it just have to be explicit. For me that would have been a much simpler "fixing the app". Cheers, Csaba.
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: