Re: [PERFORM] Projecting currentdb to more users
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PERFORM] Projecting currentdb to more users |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1121199095.8208.245.camel@state.g2switchworks.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PERFORM] Projecting currentdb to more users (Mark Rae <mrae@purplebat.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PERFORM] Projecting currentdb to more users
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 15:06, Mark Rae wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 01:41:14PM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 13:24, Mohan, Ross wrote: > > > From AMD's suit against Intel. Perhaps relevant to some PG/AMD issues. > > Well, this is, right now, just AMD's supposition about Intel's > > behaviour, I'm not sure one way or the other if Intel IS doing this. > > I think its more a case of AMD now having solid evidence to back > up the claims. > > This discovery, and that fact that you could get round it by > toggling some flags, was being discussed on various HPC mailing > lists around about the beginning of this year. Wow! That's pretty fascinating. So, is the evidence pretty overwhelming that this was not simple incompetence, but real malice? I could see either one being a cause of this issue, and wouldn't really be surprised by either one.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: