Re: multiple action rules
| От | Scott Marlowe |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: multiple action rules |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1119530390.8208.41.camel@state.g2switchworks.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: multiple action rules (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: multiple action rules
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 20:28, Tom Lane wrote: > Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com> writes: > > Well, what really gets me is that basically, the syntax diagram in > > the psql environment has a syntax diagram that makes sense to me. > > > So I guess if there was a "patch" it would basically reference the syntax > > rules given by psql \h create rule in the documentation. > > Hmm? psql's \h output is mechanically extracted from the sgml docs. > Or are you looking at someplace other than the CREATE RULE reference > page? I don't think you caught the end of my message. I was looking at the 7.4 docs when I started writing, but by the end had gone to the developer docs, where the change is already made. So there's no need for a patch for that. Now I'm thinking I should make a patch for a demonstration of making a rule with >1 action though...
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: