Re: Question about "Unrecognized SPI code" ...
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Question about "Unrecognized SPI code" ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 11181.1109097182@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Question about "Unrecognized SPI code" ... (Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres@cybertec.at>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres@cybertec.at> writes: > ERROR: SPI_execute_plan failed executing query "INSERT INTO > view_nonsense VALUES (10, 20)": Unrecognized SPI code 0 > CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function "debug" line 4 at SQL statement > SPI_result_code_string(int code) and PL/pgSQL don't seem to be aware of > DO NOTHING rules. Hmm. What's happening is that _SPI_execute_plan() initializes its local result variable to 0, and then that ends up getting returned because the execute-one-query loop executes zero times. Since 0 isn't a defined SPI result code, this seems bad. The question is what to return instead. Of the currently defined SPI result codes, SPI_OK_UTILITY seems the closest, but it implies that something happened when nothing did. Is it worth inventing a new result code SPI_OK_NOTHING (or similar) to describe this case? That would possibly imply changing a lot of SPI-using code to handle the new result alternative. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: