Re: Filesystem
| От | Martin Fandel |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Filesystem |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1117806720.4380.129.camel@fandelm.ecommit.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Filesystem (Alex Turner <armtuk@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Hi i have tested a xfs+LVM installation with the scalix (HP OpenMail) Mailserver (it's a little time ago). I had at that time some problems using xfs_freeze. I used a script for freezing the fs and making storing the snapshots. Sometimes the complete Server hangs (no blinking cursor, no possible logins, no network). I don't know if it was a hardware problem or if it was the xfs-software. I installed/compiled the newest kernel for this system (i think it was a 2.6.9) to check out if it's maybe a kernel-problem. But on the next days, the system hangs again. After that i used reiserfs again. I tested it with Suse Linux Enterprise Server 8. Has someone heared about such problems? That is the only reason that i have a bit fear to use xfs for a critical database :/. Best regards, Martin Am Freitag, den 03.06.2005, 09:18 -0400 schrieb Alex Turner: > We have been using XFS for about 6 months now and it has even > tolerated a controller card crash. So far we have mostly good things > to report about XFS. I benchmarked raw throughputs at various stripe > sizes, and XFS came out on top for us against reiser and ext3. I also > used it because of it's supposed good support for large files, which > was verified somewhat by the benchmarks. > > I have noticed a problem though - if you have 800000 files in a > directory, it seems that XFS chokes on simple operations like 'ls' or > 'chmod -R ...' where ext3 doesn't, don't know about reiser, I went > straight back to default after that problem (that partition is not on > a DB server though). > > Alex Turner > netEconomist > > On 6/3/05, Martin Fandel <martin.fandel@alphyra-evs.de> wrote: > Hi @ all, > > i have only a little question. Which filesystem is preferred > for > postgresql? I'm plan to use xfs (before i used reiserfs). The > reason > is the xfs_freeze Tool to make filesystem-snapshots. > > Is the performance better than reiserfs, is it reliable? > > best regards, > Martin > > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an > appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so > that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: