Re: postgresql-8.0.1 performance tuning
От | Martin Fandel |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgresql-8.0.1 performance tuning |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1117716600.4380.13.camel@fandelm.ecommit.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgresql-8.0.1 performance tuning ("Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: postgresql-8.0.1 performance tuning
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Hi, hmmm i don't understand which are the best values for shmmax and shmall. I've googled around but every site says something different. I've 2GB of RAM now and set it to: kernel.shmmax=715827882 kernel.shmall=2097152 Is that value ok for 2GB of RAM? I've set the shared_buffers in my postgresql.conf to 87381 (87381*8*1024 = ~715827882). Can I use www.powerpostgresql.com as reference to set this parameters? Or which site can i use? Best regards, Martin Am Mittwoch, den 01.06.2005, 11:57 +0200 schrieb Steinar H. Gunderson: > On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 07:30:37AM +0200, Cosimo Streppone wrote: > >>fsync = true > > false > > Just setting fsync=false without considering the implications is a _bad_ > idea... > > /* Steinar */ Am Mittwoch, den 01.06.2005, 11:57 +0200 schrieb Steinar H. Gunderson: > On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 07:30:37AM +0200, Cosimo Streppone wrote: > >>fsync = true > > false > > Just setting fsync=false without considering the implications is a _bad_ > idea... > > /* Steinar */
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: