Re: pg_upgrade --logfile option documentation
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade --logfile option documentation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 11176.1331219945@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade --logfile option documentation (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade --logfile option documentation
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 08:34:53AM -0500, A.M. wrote: >> It looks like the patch will overwrite the logs in the current working >> directory, for example, if pg_upgrade is run twice in the same place. Is >> that intentional? I had imagined that the logs would have been dumped in > Yes. I was afraid that continually appending to a log file on every run > would be too confusing. I could do only appends, or number the log > files, that those seemed confusing. Use one (set of) files, and always append, but at the beginning of each run print "\npg_upgrade starting at [timestamp]\n\n". Should make it reasonably clear, while not losing information. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: