Re: table synonyms
От | Tino Wildenhain |
---|---|
Тема | Re: table synonyms |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1116952770.6139.21.camel@Andrea.peacock.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: table synonyms (Mike Nolan <nolan@gw.tssi.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Am Dienstag, den 24.05.2005, 10:37 -0500 schrieb Mike Nolan: > > > I hope anybody can help me on this subject. The problem is not to find > > > a substitute for the Oracle synonyms, but a way to write queries > > > which, reliably, can be used no matter the schema which owns the > > > tables. > > > > Maybe you use views? > > Unless it changed in 8, you can't insert into or update a view. > > I don't know if rules will do the trick or not, to be honest I haven't > figured out what they can and cannot do. Yes, since views are basically constructed via rules, you can extend them with rules for update, insert etc. as well. > As someone who used to use synonyms at the user/schema level in Oracle > as a way to restrict access to a subset tables based on user-specific > criteria (eg, restricting salesman 'X' to only his accounts in the customer > master table), yes, synonyms would be nice. Views I'd say. Or you do it via SRF (set returning functions) to isolate access.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: