Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 11161.1232051992@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Updated backslash consistency patch (Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com> writes: > Le 15 janv. 09 à 17:16, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> a écrit : >> I agree, this change mostly sucks, and particularly with respect to >> \df. > Maybe it does so much 'cause you're developing system functions. No, I hardly ever use \df on a function I'm working on just at the moment, because I know what it's supposed to be. It's remembering functions that I haven't used lately that is the issue. > I've yet to try it but think it's a good feature. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Indeed... > What about a new \dfU listing only non system objects ( User ones ) ? \dfS together with \dfU would at least be a reasonably symmetric extension. I'm still of the opinion that neither is really a very helpful thing to use in connection with a pattern. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: