Re: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)
От | Larry Rosenman |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 11160000.1062633557@lerlaptop.lerctr.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...) (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Can you pass me what's in CVS (anon hasn't updated afaict). And, what didn't you like about my version? LER --On Wednesday, September 03, 2003 18:35:44 -0400 Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote: > Larry Rosenman wrote: >> >> > What does your OS want for the 3rd argument of pthread_create()? I >> >> > thought a void pointer would be OK for everyone: >> >> > >> >> > pthread_create(&thread1, NULL, (void *) func_call_1, NULL); >> >> >> >> void *(*start_routine)(void*) >> >> >> >> Here is our man page: >> >> http://lerami.lerctr.org:8458/en/man/html.3pthread/pthread_create.3pt >> >> hre ad. html >> > >> > Yes, that's what I have too. What if you have the functions taking >> > (void *) rather than void. Does that make the warnings disappear? >> >> $ r cc >> cc -O -Kpthread test_thread.c -o test_thread -lsocket -lnsl >> $ ./test_thread >> Your functions are all thread-safe >> $ > > I have updated the code to tighten the cast: > > pthread_create(&thread1, NULL, (void * (*)(void *)) func_call_1, > NULL); pthread_create(&thread2, NULL, (void * (*)(void *)) > func_call_2, NULL); > > The change is in CVS. Does that fix it? -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: