Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 11152.1490982649@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 7:14 PM, Thomas Munro > <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> my only other comment would be a bikeshed issue: >> Enr isn't a great name for a struct. > I know, but EphemeralNamedRelation starts to get kinda long, > especially when making the normal sorts of concatenations. I > started making the change and balked when I saw things like > EphemeralNamedRelationMetadataData and a function named > EphemeralNamedRelationMetadataGetTupDesc() in place of > EnrmdGetTupDesc(). A 40 character function name make for a lot of > line-wrapping to stay within pgindent limits. Any suggestions? I would vote for calling the struct typedef EphemeralNamedRelation and using the abbreviation ENR (capitalized that way, not as Enr) in related function names, where that seemed sensible. I really do *not* like "Enr" as a global name. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: