Re: Filesystem options for storing pg_data
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Filesystem options for storing pg_data |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1114013880.20921.576.camel@state.g2switchworks.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Filesystem options for storing pg_data (Joe Maldonado <jmaldonado@webehosting.biz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Filesystem options for storing pg_data
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 11:07, Joe Maldonado wrote: > Hello all, > > I am in a position where I'm torn between using ext2 vs ext3 to keep the > pg_data, pg_xlog, and pg_clog contents. > > The main concern is that switching to ext2 will not respond well to an > improper shutdown, power loss. > > My question is what is the prefered filesystem to keep this data to be > able to optimize performance and still have some fault tolerance. Generally XFS and JFS are considered superior to ext2/3. ext3, in my experience, isn't much slower than ext2. Plus the decreased time required to bring up a server after a power outage is worth something too. Having used ext3 quite a bit, I'd say it's fairly stable and reliable, but I have seen references here to know, possibly unfixable bugs. I've used XFS a few years back, and there was no great gain for what we were doing at the time, as we were CPU, not I/O bound.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: