Re: Problem with web TODO list
От | Tom Copeland |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Problem with web TODO list |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1113846036.31213.12.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Problem with web TODO list ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>) |
Список | pgsql-www |
On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 19:33 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > It does #7 now?! tell me how :D I've been longing for this! (I'd say > that is one of the most important features!) If you go to, say, the support project bug tracker: http://pgfoundry.org/tracker/?atid=146&group_id=1000013&func=browse there's a dropdown list at the top of the page and a textfield to put a search keyword in. This dropdown list is context-sensitive, so if you're viewing a forum, the "bugs" option will go away and "this forum" or something to that effect will appear. > >http://tinyurl.com/6v32z > > Hmm. Could be. I still don'tt hink it'll cut it all the wya, though. Yup, true, probably not. > Oh, most definitly :-) But I think we'll need something that's closer to > "a perfect match". You need a tool that's adapted to the way the > development works, not the other way around... Also, I'm having a hard > time seeing this one scale to the size of postgresql (not technically - > I'm sure it can do that, though it's dog slow on pgFoundry I'm sure it > can be made fast on different hardware - I'm talking about > usability-wise. The TODO list currently has somewhere around 250 items, > and if you eventually want to bring in all bugs from pgsql-bugs etc.. Yup, PGFoundry is pretty glacial right now. It's getting put on new hardware, though, which should help. FWIW, RubyForge (another GForge instance) has some projects that have a fair number of items in the trackers: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?atid=202&group_id=31&func=browse and it seems to hold up fairly well. But I agree wholeheartedly that it's better to tailor the tool to the dev process than vice versa. Yours, Tom
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: