Re: Replication solutions high volume db
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Replication solutions high volume db |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1112141797.27795.74.camel@jd2.commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Replication solutions high volume db (Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 18:12 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote: > On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 17:50, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > > > > > I think I've narrowed it down to Slony and Mammoth. > > > Any pro's or con's on one vs the other? > > > > Slony is more complicated to setup. > > Slony requires triggers and cron. > > Triggers yes, cron no... Oh? Good to know. > > > It used to be that Slony was timed replication. I do not know if that is > > still the case. > > Not the case now. I didn't use it "back in the day" (you know, last > year :) I know.. that is so 2004 :) Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > -- Command Prompt, Inc., Your PostgreSQL solutions company. 503-667-4564 Custom programming, 24x7 support, managed services, and hosting Open Source Authors: plPHP, pgManage, Co-Authors: plPerlNG Reliable replication, Mammoth Replicator - http://www.commandprompt.com/
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: