Re: Table partition for very large table
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Table partition for very large table |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1112037807.22988.0.camel@state.g2switchworks.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Table partition for very large table (Yudie Gunawan <yudiepg@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Table partition for very large table
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 13:02, Yudie Gunawan wrote: > I actualy need to join from 2 tables. Both of them similar and has > more than 4 millions records. > > CREATE TABLE prdt_old ( > groupnum int4 NOT NULL, > sku varchar(30) NOT NULL, > url varchar(150), > ); > > CREATE TABLE prdt_new( > groupnum int4 NOT NULL, > sku varchar(30) NOT NULL, > url varchar(150) NOT NULL, > ); > > The query returns group number and sku from old table where has no url > in prdt_new table. > > INSERT into prdtexpired > SELECT pn.groupnum, pn.sku > FROM prdt_old po > LEFT OUTER JOIN prdt_new pn > ON (pn.groupnum = po.groupnum and pn.sku = po.sku) > WHERE pn.url is null or pn.url= ''; > > I already have resolution for this problem where I seperate the query > for each group. > > But when I address this question, I hope that Postgresql has some kind > of table optimazion for large records. Based my experience it is > faster to query from chopped smaller table rather than query from > single huge table. I heard Oracle has some kind of table partition > that acts like single table. Hold on, let's diagnose the real problem before we look for solutions. What does explain <query> tell you? Have you analyzed the database? What are your postgresql.conf settings?
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: