Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 11119.1232137016@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > I can't shake the feeling that this is about a couple > of PostgreSQL hackers (yourself included) not wanting to type \dfS or > \dfA or something to get the behavior they currently get with \df. If > that's the case, come off it, because there's lots of evidence on this > thread (and in all likelihood elsewhere) that this behavior is not > what end-users want. As was made clear at the beginning of the thread, that's what they *think* they want, without any experience with a system that actually behaves that way. And yes I do believe I know better, both from knowing how the system works and from actual experience with the ill-considered patch that's now in HEAD. I'm willing to provide a "U" modifier but I think it will be a serious error to make that the default behavior. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: