Re: why partition pruning doesn't work?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: why partition pruning doesn't work? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1111.1527977170@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: why partition pruning doesn't work? (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: why partition pruning doesn't work?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> It's worth questioning whether this is a bug fix or an improvement. >> If the latter, it probably ought to wait for v12. > If explaining the change requires reference to tokens from the source code, > rather than something an end user could understand, I'd argue it is a bug > fix rather than an improvement. Well, the difference between volatile, stable and immutable functions is well-documented, so I don't think that's a great argument. If there's some aspect of this behavior that's not predictable from understanding which class the partition key expression falls into, then I could agree that's a bug. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: