Re: Lost rows/data corruption?
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Lost rows/data corruption? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1108682605.10956.15.camel@state.g2switchworks.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Lost rows/data corruption? ("Andrew Hall" <temp02@bluereef.com.au>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
A unix box or a mainframe that needs rebooting is generally considered broken. On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 17:11, Andrew Hall wrote: > We do the maintenance reboot (and other various log cleanups etc) as part of > our normal maintenance practice. We don't really 'need' to do this, however > we've traditionally found that operating systems perform better with an > occassional reboot (cleanup fragmented memory etc.). > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael Fuhr" <mike@fuhr.org> > To: "Andrew Hall" <temp02@bluereef.com.au> > Cc: "Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>; "Alban Hertroys" > <alban@magproductions.nl>; "Marco Colombo" <pgsql@esiway.net>; > <pgsql-general@postgresql.org> > Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 1:56 AM > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Lost rows/data corruption? > > > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 07:40:25PM +1100, Andrew Hall wrote: > >> > >> We have an automated maintenance process that reboots all our > >> customers machines every 10 days at 2am. > > > > What's the purpose of doing this? If it's necessary then the reboots > > aren't really fixing anything. Is whatever problem that prompted > > this procedure being investigated so a permanent fix can be applied? > > > > -- > > Michael Fuhr > > http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/ > > >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: