Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 11062.1502052420@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values
Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes: > On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> In short then, ICU 52.1 is just too buggy to contemplate using. > Distributions generally back-patch fixes to older ICU versions. What > upstream source did you use, exactly? I went to http://www.icu-project.org/ and downloaded icu4c-52_1-src.tgz. All the file dates therein seem to be 2013-10-04. Debian, for one, is evidently not trying very hard in that direction, since not only are the bugs still there but the line numbers I saw in my backtraces agreed with Daniel's, indicating they've not changed much of anything at all in ucol.cpp. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: