Re: Low Performance for big hospital server ..
От | amrit@health2.moph.go.th |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Low Performance for big hospital server .. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1104901633.41db76016e568@webmail.moph.go.th обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Low Performance for big hospital server .. (Gavin Sherry <swm@alcove.com.au>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
> > I will put more ram but someone said RH 9.0 had poor recognition on the Ram > > above 4 Gb? > > I think they were refering to 32 bit architectures, not distributions as > such. Sorry for wrong reason , then should I increase more RAM than 4 Gb. on 32 bit Arche.? > > Should I close the hyperthreading ? Would it make any differnce between > open and > > close the hyperthreading? > > Thanks for any comment > > In my experience, the largest performance increases come from intensive > analysis and optimisation of queries. Look at the output of EXPLAIN > ANALYZE for the queries your application is generating and see if they can > be tuned in anyway. More often than not, they can. So what you mean is that the result is the same whether close or open hyperthreading ? Will it be any harm if I open it ? The main point shiuld be adjustment the query , right. > Feel free to ask for assistence on irc at irc.freenode.net #postgresql. > People there help optimise queries all day ;-). How could I contact with those people ;=> which url ? Thanks again. Amrit Thailand
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: