Re: Low Performance for big hospital server ..
От | amrit@health2.moph.go.th |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Low Performance for big hospital server .. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1104717243.41d8a5bb9cb9b@webmail.moph.go.th обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Low Performance for big hospital server .. (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Low Performance for big hospital server ..
Re: Low Performance for big hospital server .. |
Список | pgsql-performance |
> The common wisdom of shared buffers is around 6-10% of available memory. > Your proposal below is about 50% of memory. > > I'm not sure what the original numbers actually meant, they are quite large. > I will try to reduce shared buffer to 1536 [1.87 Mb]. > also effective cache is the sum of kernel buffers + shared_buffers so it > should be bigger than shared buffers. also make the effective cache to 2097152 [2 Gb]. I will give you the result , because tomorrow [4/12/05] will be the official day of my hospital [which have more than 1700 OPD patient/day]. > Also turning hyperthreading off may help, it is unlikely it is doing any > good unless you are running a relatively new (2.6.x) kernel. Why , could you give me the reason? > I presume you are vacuuming on a regular basis? Yes , vacuumdb daily.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: