Re: Rules WHERE condition
От | Robert Fitzpatrick |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Rules WHERE condition |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1100716095.29305.19.camel@columbus.webtent.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Rules WHERE condition (Robert Fitzpatrick <robert@webtent.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 12:49, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 11:49, Michael Fuhr wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 11:20:41AM -0500, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > > > > > I have a view that used union all to merge three tables together. I was > > > hoping to create a rule, one for each table using the WHERE condition of > > > the rule to determine which table gets updated. Is this possible? > > > > See the CREATE RULE documentation: > > > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/static/sql-createrule.html > > > > Thanks, that explains a lot, but still not able to get my rule to work, > this is what I have now: > Forget that last post, it is working even though the UPDATE 0 is returned. The record did update :) Please someone let me know if you see any issues with that? Like I said, my first rule let alone with a WHERE condition. -- Robert
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: