Re: Use of reloptions by EXTENSIONs
От | Dent John |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Use of reloptions by EXTENSIONs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 10B434FE-090D-45AF-9899-89420025EE1A@qqdd.eu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Use of reloptions by EXTENSIONs (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Use of reloptions by EXTENSIONs
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thank you, Tom. (And sorry for the delay following up.) I’ve marked myself down for review for this patch in the next CF. I’ll see if I can get the patch applied and feed back on how much it move towards making my use case a viable proposition. d. > On 9 Jun 2019, at 17:21, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Dent John <denty@qqdd.eu> writes: >> I guess my question is, and I correctly understanding that reloptions are basically off-limits to EXTENSIONS? > > IIRC that's basically true. There's a lot of dissatisfaction with the > current implementation of reloptions, although I think that it's been > mainly focused on the fact that adding new ones is hard/error-prone > even within the core code. If you want to help move this along, you > could review the existing patch in the area: > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/2083183.Rn7qOxG4Ov@x200m > > and/or propose additional changes. > > regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: