Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1099b5a9-a521-93ad-c551-0cacdac8cef8@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach) (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/26/21 22:16, Thomas Munro wrote: > On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 11:32 AM Tomas Vondra > <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> The results are pretty good / similar to previous results. Replaying the >> 1h worth of work on a smaller machine takes ~5:30h without prefetching >> (master or with prefetching disabled). With prefetching enabled this >> drops to ~2h (default config) and ~1h (with tuning). > > Thanks for testing! Wow, that's a nice graph. > > This has bit-rotted already due to Robert's work on ripping out > globals, so I'll post a rebase early next week, and incorporate your > code feedback. > One thing that's not clear to me is what happened to the reasons why this feature was reverted in the PG14 cycle? regards -- Tomas Vondra EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: