Re: printTable API (was: Show INHERIT in \du)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: printTable API (was: Show INHERIT in \du) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 10998.1206893806@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | printTable API (was: Show INHERIT in \du) ("Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: printTable API (was: Show INHERIT in \du)
Re: printTable API (was: Show INHERIT in \du) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com> writes: > So, it looks like: > 1. describe malloc's the cells to zero, but print just does a local > calloc without any initialisation. There isn't any functional difference there. I am not sure, but I think the reason print.c has its own malloc wrappers instead of depending on common.c's is that we use print.c in some bin/scripts/ programs that do not want common.c too. > 2. describe only does an mbvalidate for WIN32, but print does it in all cases. I don't know why describe only does that for WIN32; it looks inconsistent to me too. Possibly some trolling in the CVS history would give a clue about this. If you're not actively working on this patch right now, I am going to go ahead and commit the other open patches for describe.c. If you do have a patch in progress, I'm willing to hold off to avoid any merge conflicts. Let me know. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: