Re: do we EXEC_BACKEND on Mac OS X?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: do we EXEC_BACKEND on Mac OS X? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 10986.1349282497@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: do we EXEC_BACKEND on Mac OS X? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: do we EXEC_BACKEND on Mac OS X?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> Noticed while perusing >> http://lwn.net/Articles/518306/ > I'm afraid Brian was just looking for an excuse to dump on Apple. We > have a lot of years of Postgres experience showing that fork() works > fine on OS X. BTW, I think the commenter at the bottom of the thread puts his finger on the core of the real problem: > I'd wager most libraries are not fork safe, including such libraries > as SQLite as mentioned in the SQLite FAQ. Libraries that talk to the > outside world contain much state that is not safe to share. To bring that closer to home, suppose you have a program with an open database connection in libpq, and you fork(), and then parent and child both try to use the connection. How well would that work? Is it the fault of fork()? I think Apple is just pointing out that their framework libraries have similar issues. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: