Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 10986.1033922774@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large (Greg Copeland <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Copeland <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net> writes: > I personally would at least like to see an aio implementation and would > be willing to even help benchmark it to benchmark/validate any returns > in performance. Surely if testing reflected a performance boost it > would be considered for baseline inclusion? It'd be considered, but whether it'd be accepted would have to depend on the size of the performance boost, its portability (how many platforms/scenarios do you actually get a boost for), and the extent of bloat/uglification of the code. I can't personally get excited about something that only helps if your server is starved for RAM --- who runs servers that aren't fat on RAM anymore? But give it a shot if you like. Perhaps your analysis is pessimistic. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: