Re: source documentation tool doxygen
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: source documentation tool doxygen |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 10961.1137437498@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: source documentation tool doxygen (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: source documentation tool doxygen
Re: source documentation tool doxygen |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes: > I don't think it would be all that painful. There would be no need to > convert the entire source tree to use proper Doxygen-style comments in > one fell swoop: individual files and modules can be converted whenever > anyone gets the inclination to do so. I don't think the maintenance > burden would be very substantial, either. In the previous go-round on this topic, I seem to recall some concern about side-effects, to wit reducing the readability of the comments for ordinary non-doxygen code browsing. I'd be quite against taking any noticeable hit in that direction. A quick look through the doxygen manual doesn't make it sound too invasive, but I am worried about how well it will coexist with pgindent. It seems both tools think they can dictate the meaning of the characters immediately after /* of a comment block. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: