Re: Tryint to match Solaris-Oracle performance with
От | markir@coretech.co.nz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Tryint to match Solaris-Oracle performance with |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1095588281.29ef3c9d222ad@mail.coretech.co.nz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Tryint to match Solaris-Oracle performance with directio? (Mischa Sandberg <ischamay.andbergsay@activestateway.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Hi Mischa, You probably need to determine whether the bottleneck is cpu or disk (should be easy enough!) Having said that, assuming your application is insert/update intensive I would recommend: - mount the ufs filesystems Pg uses *without* logging - use postgresql.conf setting fsync_method=fdatasync These changes made my Pgbench results improve by a factor or 4 (enough to catch the big O maybe...) Then you will need to have a look at your other postgresql.conf parameters! (posting this file to the list might be a plan) Cheers Mark Quoting Mischa Sandberg <ischamay.andbergsay@activestateway.com>: > Our product (Sophos PureMessage) runs on a Postgres database. > > Some of our Solaris customers have Oracle licenses, and they've > commented on the performance difference between Oracle and Postgresql > on such boxes. In-house, we've noticed the 2:1 (sometimes 5:1) > performance difference in inserting rows (mostly 2-4K), between > Postgresql on Solaris 8 and on Linux, for machines with comparable > CPU's and RAM. > >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: