Re: Do we still need these NOTICEs?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Do we still need these NOTICEs? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 10954.1026879031@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Do we still need these NOTICEs? (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Do we still need these NOTICEs?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes: > One thing I wondered about here -- is it still possible to use a > sequence, which is autogenerated by a SERIAL column, as the default > value for another table? Sure, same as before. > If so, does this create another dependency to > prevent dropping the sequence, and hence the original (creating) table also? As the code stands, no. The other table's default would look likenextval('first_table_col_seq') and the dependency deducer only sees nextval() and a string constant in this. Someday I'd like to see us support the Oracle-ish syntaxfirst_table_col_seq.nextval which would expose the sequence reference in a way that allows the system to understand it during static examination of a query. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: